Foreword
Sensory Museum Design competition organized by artuminate in association with archiol, this competition received 112 entries from around the world.
Competition Jury:
• Andreea Felciuc
• Lawrence Daykin
Scroll down to check the winning entries.
Top 3
FIRST
Andrei Dragos Ormangi, Alexandra Elena Burtea & Dana Beatrice Ponyiczky
Romania
SECOND
Bingkun Liu
China
THIRD
Irina Cherkasskih & Ekaterina Solovets
Russia
FIRST PRIZE WINNER
___________________
Colours Of The Mirrored
City
Andrei Dragos Ormangi, Alexandra Elena Burtea & Dana Beatrice Ponyiczky
Romania
JURY COMMENTS
“A playful approach for bringing a sense of the urban and outdoor environment in a well curated interior series of spaces. Even if understood as a single insertion, a bespoke urban object, it is a joyful cluster of sensory experiences, well communicated and esthetically appealing.”
-Andreea Felciuc
“-Bold, bright and striking
- beautifully presented with super diagrams
- well developed but not over-thought - my favourite
- part museum, part experience, part adult playground.”
-Lawrence Daykin
SECOND PRIZE WINNER
___________________
“Consciousness arises when God is silent.”
Bingkun Liu
China
JURY COMMENTS
“The fact that it is understood as an intervention, a singular object, which obstructs the natural space but does not delimit it from it, makes the concept of the proposal a unique approach to the idea of a museum. It is well explained, interesting and completely surprising.”
-Andreea Felciuc
“- Beautifully modeled geometry and diagrams, however its very literal -
- The maze is an overused trope unfortunately - but i like that you have chosen to perform this at a grand scale in a unique location!
- Nice geometry for the walls, although it’s very reminiscent of a project by BIG architects?”
-Lawrence Daykin
THIRD PRIZE WINNER
___________________
The Museum of Feelings
Irina Cherkasskih & Ekaterina Solovets
Russia
JURY COMMENTS
“The concept is seductive. The attention to creating a concept for the experience of each space is an asset. From an aesthetic point of view simplicity helps to outline ideas but is not very well communicated.”
-Andreea Felciuc
“- Simple and effective - my favourite
- I like the use of very bold architectural expressions to stimulate emotions
- Personally I am a huge fan of your descriptive style, poetic and almost fictional - build on this style - its effective.
- The design isn’t very developed, but that doesn’t matter - your message is clear.”
-Lawrence Daykin
SPECIAL MENTION
___________________
JURY COMMENTS
Honorable Mention
Kwan Yew Teoh, Ka Hui Lim & Meen Yee Ooi
Australia
Wiktoria Ciszak, Karolina Kozłowska & Michalina Linkowska
Poland
Margarita Karaseva
Russia
HONOURABLE MENTION
___________________
Museum of Healing
Kwan Yew Teoh, Ka Hui Lim & Meen Yee Ooi
Australia
JURY COMMENTS
“A coherent clustered and a well-knit concept. The premises are well argued, as is the main, key idea. A better aesthetics would help even more to communicate ideas. ”
-Andreea Felciuc
“-Lovely presentation + graphics
- considerate concept - nice take on the idea of "the senses"
- connecting people with the landscape as an idea for healing resonates with me well
- I appreciate that you have thought about shape, materials and construction etc - but you didnt feel the need to let these details overwhelm the concept presentation”.
-Lawrence Daykin
HONOURABLE MENTION
___________________
Think Out Of The Box
Wiktoria Ciszak, Karolina Kozłowska & Michalina Linkowska
Poland
JURY COMMENTS
“Aesthetics and concept are attractive, but the concept could have been more creative and sensory. ”
-Andreea Felciuc
“- Very cool diagrams, and i like your collage style for the visuals. But for a space which should be compelling and interesting they are a bit too monochromatic - great style though.
- I love your section diagram and like the idea of exploring these unique boxes.
- I like why you have chosen this particular shape and style.”
-Lawrence Daykin
HONOURABLE MENTION
___________________
Sensory Museum - The place of Human senses
Margarita Karaseva
Russia
JURY COMMENTS
Jury Comments:
“It is interesting how the project manages to capture the idea of rest and rest, of finding oneself in a dynamic way. The narrow plan of the facade succeeds in deceiving, making the surprise of the spatial amplitude even greater. The panels manage to capture the proposed atmosphere sufficiently well and descriptively. ”
-Andreea Felciuc
“-Your space is too big - I would recommend to start smaller, or try to justify the site, is it a real space?
-Some interesting concepts here, however again, too many with not enough development.
-I love the idea of a sand room, and creating a medative sand dune within architecture - pursue this?
-I understand the darkness should be medative and embracing, but your renderings are very cold.”
-Lawrence Daykin
HONOURABLE MENTION
___________________
JURY COMMENTS
HONOURABLE MENTION
___________________
JURY COMMENTS
Shortlisted Entries
Shortlisted Entries:
• Victoria Mishakova (Russia)
• Siying Wang & Jiang Bian (China)
• Yuxiang Tan, Yan Chao Wang & Han Wang (China)
• Eman Allam (Egypt)
• Karl Matta (Lebanon)
• Savciuc Madalina, Gavrilă Diana & Marinescu Andreea Irina (Romania)
• Wang Zhi & Xiong Xiang (China)
• Rui Wang (China)
• Jelezniac Bianca-Ruxandra, Chirchiboi Maria-Alexandra & Stan Patricia (Romania)
• Anastasia Sabinova (Russia)
Organizers
